Saturday, October 12, 2019
Piercing the Corporate Veil Essay -- Papers
 Piercing the Corporate Veil       Since the establishment in Salomon v Salomon, the separate legal     personality has been long recognised in English law for centuries,     that is to say, a limited liability company has its own legal identity     distinct from its shareholders or directors. However, in certain     circumstances the courts may be prepared to look behind the company at     the actions of the directors and shareholders. This is known as     "piercing the corporate veil".       There are numerous cases concerning the "piercing the corporate veil",     among which, Jones v Lipman[1] was a typical case. Lipman sold land to     Jones by a written contract but refused to complete the sale because     of another good deal, instead he offered damages for breach of     contract. To put the house out of reach of Jones, he bought a company     "off the shelf" and conveyed the house to it. In an action against     Lipman and the company, the court granted the specific performance and     ruled that "the defendant company is the creature of the first     defendant, a device and ...                      
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.